My Photo

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Search Blueweeds


  • WWW
    blueweeds.typepad.com
Blog powered by TypePad

« Albo(R) Takes A Cab On His Abuser Fee "Solution" | Main | FCNP Reports City Leaders Shocked At Partisanship In Richmond, But Still Believe Tooth Fairy Will Make It Better »

January 22, 2008

Why Jim Scott (D) Concurred On Deferring House Gun Bill

Jscott The Republican majority in the Virginia House of Delegates, despite emotional testimony from family and victims of the Virginia Tech tragedy, forced a deferral of a bill designed to close the so-called gun show loophole in Virginia gun laws.  More from Fairfax Times here.  The bill was part of a series of gun law reforms recommended by the public task force investigating the shootings at Virginia Tech last April, and was supported by Gov. Kaine (D). 

The votes were originally along party lines.  Del. Jim Scott (D), who represents Falls Church City and parts of Merrifield, changed his vote to concur with the majority in order to preserve the ability to reconsider the bill in House committee.  A motion to reconsider may only be made by a member voting in the majority.  Del. Poisson (D - Fairfax) did the same thing. 

Falls Church City unanimously recommended passage of a bill closing the gun show loophole in its 2008 legislative package.  Council Member Hal Lippman has been in Richmond to monitor progress on the City's legislative agenda.   

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341d18f153ef00e54fedbb0c8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Why Jim Scott (D) Concurred On Deferring House Gun Bill:

Comments

Video Albums

Topix - Falls Church City

LeftyBlogs


Via BuzzFeed

Extra Stuff

Legal Stuff

  • Copyright 2008. Blueweeds, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Blueweeds is a community media forum to discuss life, politics, and events impacting the City of Falls Church. The opinions expressed by users of the weblog are attributable only to the individual author and third party comments do not neccessarily reflect those of Blueweeds.